Profit Management & Inflation: Profit, Functions of Profit

 

The term profit has a distinct meaning for different people, such as businessmen, accountants, policymakers, workers and economists.

Profit simply means a positive gain generated from business operations or investments after subtracting all expenses or costs.

In economic terms, profit is defined as a reward received by an entrepreneur by combining all the factors of production to serve the need of individuals in the economy faced with uncertainties. In layman's language, profit refers to an income that flows to an investor. In accountancy, profit implies an excess revenue overall paid-out costs. Profit in economics is termed as a pure profit or economic profit or just profit.

Profit differs from the return in three respects namely:

(i) Profit is a residual income, while the return is a total revenue

(ii) Profits may be negative, whereas returns, such as wages and interest are always positive

(iii) Profits have greater fluctuations than returns

Functions of Profit

Profit is the primary objective of all business organizations. The expectation of earning higher profits for business organizations induces them to invest money in new ventures. This results in large employment opportunities in the economy which further raises the level of income. Consequently, there is a rise in the demand for goods and services in the economy. In this way, profit generated by business organizations plays a significant role in the economy.

According to Peter Ducker, there are three main purposes of profit, which are explained as follows:

(i) Tool for measuring performance

Refers to the fact that profit generated by an organization helps in estimating the effectiveness of its business efforts. If the profits earned by an organization are high, it indicates the efficient management of its business. However, profit is not the most efficient measure of estimating the business efficiency of an organization, but is useful to measure the general efficiency of the organization.

(ii) Source of covering costs

Helps organizations to cover various costs, such as replacement costs, technical costs, and costs related to other risks and uncertainties. An organization needs to earn sufficient profit to cover its variable costs and survive in the business.

(iii) Aid to ensure future capital

Assures the availability of capital in future for various purposes, such as innovation and expansion. For example, if the retained profits of an organization are high, it may invest in various projects. This would help in the business expansion and success of the organization.

Apart from the aforementioned functions, the following are the positive results of high profits:

(i) Investment in research and development

This leads to better technology and dynamic efficiency. An organization invests in research and development activities for its further expansion if it earns a high profit. The organization would lose its competitiveness if it does not invest in research and development activities.

(ii) Reward for shareholders

Includes dividends for shareholders. If an organization earns high profits, it would provide high dividends to shareholders. As a result, the organization would attract more investors, which is crucial for the growth of the organization.

(iii) Aid for economies

Implies that profits are helpful for economies. If organizations generate high profits, they would be able to cope with adverse economic situations, such as recession and inflation. This results in the stability of economies even in adverse situations.

(iv) Tool to stimulate government finances

Implies that if the profits generated by organizations are high, they are liable for paying high taxes. This helps the government to earn high revenue and spend on social welfare.

Theories of Profit

The profits of businesses depend on the successful management of risks and uncertainties by entrepreneurs. These risks can be cost risks due to changes in wage rates, prices, technology, and other market risks. Different economists have presented different views on profit.

  1. Walker’s Theory

An American economist, Prof F. A. Walker propounded the theory of profit, known as the rent theory of profit. According to him “as rent is the difference between least and most fertile land similarly, profit is the difference between earnings of the least and most efficient entrepreneurs.” He advocated that profit is the rent of exceptional abilities that an entrepreneur possesses over others.

According to Walker; profit is the difference between the earnings of the least and most efficient entrepreneurs. An entrepreneur with the least efficiency generally strives to cover only the cost of production. On the other hand, an efficient entrepreneur is rewarded with profit for his differential ability.

Thus, profit is also said to be the reward for the differential ability of the entrepreneur. While formulating this theory, Walker assumed the condition of perfect competition in which all organizations are supposed to have the equal managerial ability. In this case, there is no pure profit and all the organizations earn only managerial wages known as normal profit.

The rent theory was mainly criticized for its inability to explain the real nature of profits.

Apart from this, the theory failed in the following aspects:

  • Provides only a measure of profit. The theory does not focus on the nature of profit, which is of utmost importance.

  • Assumes that profits arise because of the superior or exceptional ability of the entrepreneur, which is not always true. Profit can also be the result of the monopolistic position of the entrepreneur.

  1. Clark’s Dynamic Theory

Clark’s dynamic theory was introduced by an American economist, J.B. Clark. According to him, profit does not arise in a static economy, but arises in a dynamic economy. A static economy is characterized as one where the size of the population, the amount of capital, the nature of human wants, and the methods of production remain the same and there is no risk and uncertainty. Therefore, according to Clark, only normal profits are earned in a static economy. However, an economy is always dynamic in nature that changes from time to time.

A dynamic economy is characterized by an increase in population, an increase in capital, multiplication of consumer wants, advancement in production techniques, and changes in the form of business organizations. The dynamic world offers opportunities for entrepreneurs to make pure profits.

According to Clark, the role of entrepreneurs in a dynamic environment is to take advantage of changes that help in promoting businesses, expand sales, and reduce costs. Entrepreneurs, who successfully take advantage of changing conditions in a dynamic economy, make pure profit.

There are internal and external factors that make the world dynamic. Internal changes are changes that take place within the organization, such as layoffs and hiring of employees, product changes, and infrastructure changes. The external changes are of two kinds, namely, regular changes and irregular changes.

  1. Hawley’s Risk Theory

The risk theory of profit was given by F. B. Hawley in 1893. According to Hawley, “profit is the reward of risk-taking in a business. During the conduct of any business activity, all other factors of production i.e. land, labour, and capital have guaranteed incomes from the entrepreneur. They are least concerned whether the entrepreneur makes the profit or undergoes losses.”

Hawley refers to profit as a reward for taking risks. According to him, the greater the risk, the higher the expected profit. The risks arise in the business due to various reasons, such as the non-availability of crucial raw materials, the introduction of better substitutes by competitors, obsolescence of technology, fall in the market prices, and natural and manmade disasters. Risks in businesses are inevitable and cannot be predicted. According to Hawley, an entrepreneur is rewarded for undertaking risks.

There is criticism against this theory that profits arise not because risks are borne, but because the superior entrepreneurs can reduce them. The profits arise only because of better management and supervision by entrepreneurs. Another criticism is that profits are never in the proportion to the risk undertaken. Profits may be more in enterprises with low risks and less in enterprises with high risks.

  1. Knight’s Theory

Prof Knight propounded the theory known as the uncertainty-bearing theory of profits. According to the theory, profit is a reward for the uncertainty bearing and not the risk-taking. Knight divided the risks into calculable and non-calculable risks. Calculable risks are those risks whose probability of occurrence can be easily estimated with the help of the given data, such as risks due to fire and theft.

The calculable risks can be insured. On the other hand, non-calculable risks are those risks that cannot be accurately calculated and insured such as shifts in demand for a product. These non-calculable risks are uncertain, while calculable risks are certain and can be anticipated.

According to Knight, “risks are foreseen in nature and can be insured”. Thus, risk-taking is not a function of an entrepreneur, but of insurance organizations. Therefore, an entrepreneur gets profit as a reward for bearing uncertainties and not for risks that are borne by insurance organizations.

The theory of uncertainty bearing is criticized on the following grounds:

  • Assumes that profit is the result of uncertainty-bearing ability of an entrepreneur, which does not always hold true. The profit can also be the reward for other aspects, such as strong coordination and market share.

  • Fails to show any relevance with the real world.

  1. Schumpeter’s Innovation Theory

Joseph Schumpeter propounded a theory called innovation according to which profits are the reward for innovation He advocated that innovation is the introduction of a new product, new technology, new method of production, and new sources of raw materials. This helps in lowering the cost of production or improving the quality of production. Innovation also includes new policies or measures by an entrepreneur for an organization.

In general, innovation can take place in two ways, which are as follows:

  • Reducing the cost of production and earning high profits. The cost of production can be reduced by introducing new machines and improving production techniques.

  • Stimulating the demand by enhancing the existing improvement or finding new markets.

According to innovation theory, profit is the cause and effect of innovations. In other words, it acts as a necessary incentive for making innovation.

Schumpeter’s innovation theory is criticized in two aspects, which are as follows:

  • Ignores uncertainty as a source of profit

  • Denies the role of risk in profit

Comments